Financials
Location:
Current Revenue for Period
48% to goal
▲ 3% month
▼ 1% year
$155,430
based on completed WIP
Projected Revenue by Period End
102% to goal
▲ 14% month
▲ 8% year
$335,000
based on completed WIP
Current Gross Profit for Period
42% to goal
▼ 2% month
▲ 5% year
$68,200
based on completed WIP
Projected Gross Profit by Period End
92% to goal
▲ 4% month
▲ 6% year
$150,500
based on completed WIP
Cash Flow
Projected Surplus/Deficit
Current Cash Balance
$132,450
Est. End-of-Week Balance
$138,900
Est. End-of-Month Balance
$175,200
Accounts Receivable
0-30 $22,400
31-60 $14,250
61-90 $3,800
90+ $1,550
Averages
Average RO
$3,450
Average Fixed Expense Per RO
$580
Average Net Profit Per RO
$920
Average RO Breakdown
■ Labor 51%
■ Parts 37%
■ Materials 12%
ARO Labor
$1,750
ARO Parts
$1,300
ARO Materials
$400
Profit / Break Even
Profit Per Billed Hour
$495
Break Even Date for This Period
May 22, 2026
Jobs / $ Needed to Break Even
15 / $51,750
Paint Department Performance
Paint Labor Efficiency
148%
Produced Paint Labor Hours ÷ Employee Hours Attended
Benchmark: ≥ 140%
Benchmark: ≥ 140%
P&M Cost / Refinish Hour
$18.50
Total Paint & Material Cost ÷ Paint Labor Hours Sold
Tracks material waste and over-mixing impact.
Tracks material waste and over-mixing impact.
Ounces / Refinish Hour
4.2 oz
Total fluid ounces mixed ÷ Total paint labor hours
Protects margins from excessive tinting/usage.
Protects margins from excessive tinting/usage.
Rework / Come-back Rate
1.8%
Vehicles returned for paint defects per month.
Diagnoses upstream prep and application issues.
Diagnoses upstream prep and application issues.
Paint Booth Utilization & Cycle Times
Daily Booth Cycles Run
Total full-bake cycles executed by day
Monday
6 cycles
Tuesday
7 cycles
Wednesday
5 cycles
Thursday
6 cycles
Friday
7 cycles
Avg Daily Cycles: 6.2
↑ 0.4 from last week
Filler / Small Parts Cycle Time
Utilizing empty booth space alongside standard runs
Standard (Full-Car)
Filler (Small Parts)
Filler System Efficiency adds +28% capacity
Estimator Efficiency
Supplement Rates by Estimator
| Estimator | Avg Supplement Amt | Close Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| T. Johnson | $421 | 86% |
| A. Smith | $895 | 72% |
| M. Davis | $510 | 78% |
| P. Lee | $1,240 | 61% |
Severity by Estimator
| Estimator | Avg Severity Level | RO Count |
|---|---|---|
| T. Johnson | Med | 44 |
| A. Smith | Low | 38 |
| M. Davis | High | 24 |
| P. Lee | Med | 16 |